Tuesday, April 06, 2010

BEASTS OF BURDEN by Evan Dorkin and Jill Thompson (Dark Horse)

The sleepy American everytown of Burden Hill is actually a Buffy-esque Hellmouth, with monsters galore springing up on a distressingly regular basis. The humans, too wrapped up in their mundane human concerns, are oblivious to the supernatural goings-on. Fortunately, the dogs and cats are on the case! They've teamed up, gained some wisdom in their struggles, and even learned a little magic. Together they stand between a vague yet looming occult menace and "all who live, on two legs or four."

Writer Evan Dorkin has explained that when he was invited to contribute a story to the anthology graphic novel, Dark Horse Book of Hauntings, "I was fooling around, I wanted to do a story about a haunted house, tried a haunted dollhouse, didn’t work, so I went with a haunted doghouse." He mentions in pretty much every interview that, once he settled on an animal-centered story, he had artist Jill Thompson in mind from the very outset, for the "storybook" feel he knew she could bring to the project through her evocative watercolors. The resulting story, "Stray," netted Thompson an Eisner Award (her fourth, at the time), and led to three more collaborations, each heftier than the last, one of which earned Thompson another Eisner and another of which won the Eisner for "Best Short Story," until Dark Horse greenlighted a full-blown four-issue miniseries, Beasts of Burden.

Although the first short story was only meant to be a one-off, Dorkin does a nice job of plausibly expanding the narrative. He embroils the animals in further adventures into horror in the subsequent stories, until he just goes ahead and establishes in the miniseries that there's been something systematic rather than coincidental about the threats they've faced, and confers on them a special status as watchers/guardians/hunters against supernatural evil. As for those threats, Dorkin mixes it up very well between hitting traditional horror beats like the pack of zombies in "Let Sleeping Dogs Lie," more outré fare like the demon frog of BoB #1, and in-between stuff like the undead monstrosity in BoB #4.

The most searing tale is "Lost," in BoB #2. Although the supernatural figures very heavily in it, its thematic focus brings to the foreground a very unpleasant mundane reality that serves as an ever-present undercurrent in all the other stories, starting with the first: these animals live in a mainly human environment which has little regard for their instincts, pleasures, or all-too-often even their lives. Even the strongest, bravest, and fiercest among them are vulnerable to neglect, careless harm, and outright cruelty from humans. That grim baseline fact of life (and death) serves as a necessary ballast to the brightness of the daytime settings and the cuteness of the characters, and interjects a note of "social realism" (for want of a better term) into the otherwise quite fantastical proceedings. Perhaps worst of all in "Lost," three gentle creatures horribly lose their innocence as they're overwhelmed into a terrible revenge. Dorkin has said of this story, "People wrote that they had to go hug their dogs or cats after finishing it."

By no means, though, is Beasts of Burden just some dark, joyless slog. Far to the contrary, it's a labor of love by two people who love animals, and a celebration of pets that pet owners can truly celebrate. Dorkin writes appealingly characterizing dialogue:

. . . touching moments of loyalty and affection:

. . . and just plain fun stuff, like this:

As should be obvious by now, Thompson's glorious art sells all of it--every character, every action, every bit of scenery, every single moment--for everything it's worth.

Her crowning achievement here is to draw the animals as naturalistically as possible and avoid Disney-fying them, and yet still endow them with a nearly-human expressiveness. She says of this challenge:
You have to take a lot of artistic license to give them more human facial features. Dogs are a bit easier than cats because they have those cutie-pie eyebrows that they use to manipulate you to get food and stuff out of you. But I have to add a little bit to anthropomorphize them a bit in their facial features.
With the cats, she takes even more license to make them even more cartoony at times. The character Orphan looks fairly realistic on the cover of BoB #3:

In fact, Thompson usually depicts Orphan with a slightly lighter touch, as evident in the pictures above. But when it comes to stronger emotions, she seems more willing to go with broader expressions, even sight gags:

Her prior manga work sometimes seems to inform her exaggeration of emotion in the cats, for example in this panel, where Orphan (painted black) sports a practically super-deformed expression:

And then there's Dymphna, who arrives in a swarm of black cats in this whimsical yet subtly menacing image:

Thompson always stylizes her to one degree or another, as part of her mystique and appeal:

As should also be obvious from panels above, Thompson can damn well deliver the horror and action as needed. She might favor a more subtle brand of horror (she always says she does in interviews), but when the story calls for blood and guts, she serves it up steaming hot with the best of them. And it strikes a satisfyingly jarring juxtaposition with her Norman-Rockwell-bordering-on-Thomas-Kinkade small-townsy scenery of Burden Hill.

These comics are just beautiful to look at and engaging to read. In my review of Sara Gruen's circus novel Water for Elephants, I noted that,
Tolkien once mentioned the "desire to converse with other living things" as one of our "profounder wishes"; the "sense of separation of ourselves from beasts" is one of our "ancient limitations," and overcoming it is among the foremost of our "old ambitions and desires" which touch "the very roots of fantasy."
Beasts of Burden firmly grasps those "very roots of fantasy." The fourth and final issue concludes with a promise of more to come, and I can only hope Dorkin and Thompson keep it. I highly recommend this for any fan of horror comics, especially those with a soft spot for dogs or cats. Check out the first three stories for free at the Dark Horse website!

Congrats to Rondo Winners

Here they are!

Sunday, April 04, 2010

Coming Attractions

Going to Wilco bit a monster chunk out of my budget, so to my chagrin, there are a few things I wish I could post about sooner that will have to wait until I get paid this Wednesday and can afford to put my hands on the relevant materials.

1) I still need to get Blackest Night #8. Then I'll do an overview of the whole shebang--what I loved and what I didn't care for quite so much. Overall, I'm glad I took this ride, and I suspect time will only make me more fond of it. Just backing off for a while from my intensive initial coverage of it has already gone a long way toward softening some of my harder feelings toward a number of aspects I considered disappointing at first blush. Anyway, more to come . . .

2) Before I get to the next post in my "Imagination vs. Art in Horror" series, I've learned of another book I'd like to read, which is directly relevant to the specific subject of that next post, and which will mean a long drive to the nearest university library (i.e. gas money I ain't got) to get it.

One thing I'll say about this series--when I said I intend to get to the bottom of the question at hand, I wasn't fucking around. It's going to be very long and technical, and each post is likely to present only one step in an argument, the conclusion of which will in turn serve as only one step in my larger argument. There's a lot of big stuff I'm trying to get right here once and for all, so I don't mind being patient and putting in the extra work. No cutting corners on this project for me.

What's funny is that the question of whether showing or suggesting a monster is more effective in a work of horror sounds like small potatoes--a fairly nitpicky and parochial question that could only interest horror fans--but really "getting to the bottom" of it will take us to the bottom of a lot of much huger issues of much more general interest. Like what is imagination, how did it evolve, how does it work, why does it work the way it does, what can it do, what are its limits, . . . ?, etc. Refracting the question across the various media of film, comics, and literature will also require answering some big questions about those media and their differing strengths and weaknesses in provoking emotional responses. We'll also end up with something pretty close to a definitive and comprehensive understanding of horror. I don't care how cocky it sounds for me to say that--it's fucking true. Stick around and see if it isn't.

3) I still have a lot of circus stuff I need to get to, and hope to start back in on that soon. Actually, this has nothing to do with lack of funds, but it is something I'd moved to the backburner that I'd like to bring to the front again. Josh Simmons is mostly to blame for the holdup here, as I scratch my head and rack my brains to figure out what the fuck to say about his circus comics.

Fortunately, while I wait to get paid, I have plenty of other stuff sitting around that I can maybe post about. Stay tuned, and stay groovy!

Obligatory Annual Rehashing of My Fumetti Easter Desecration Post

Here it is. (And no, this one's not a Rickroll.)

Saturday, April 03, 2010

Last day for Rondo voting

So get those votes in!

It's funny--I'd like to think the horror blogosphere has finally come down with a salutary case of "award fatigue," but the Rondos have been around longer than most (online, anyway) and earned their cred, as far as I'm concerned, so I don't mind pimping them. You can vote for Groovy Age if you want; I've never won in years when I've made a big push for it, and don't expect to this year, when I haven't.

The one endorsement I really want to make is in the Best Fan Event category. Please vote for the Boris Karloff Blogathon, which Frankensteinia did such an outstanding job of organizing, hosting, and promoting, with truly knock-your-socks-off results in terms of both quantity and quality. I'm proud to have participated, first in a fun collaboration (one, two) with Kimberly Lindbergs of Cinebeats (also up for a Rondo in Best Horror Blog category), and then in my take on Karloff's role as the wurdalak in Mario Bava's Black Sabbath. If this thing wins, as I believe it deserves to, that's honor enough for me.

Thursday, April 01, 2010

NEW FUMETTI SITE--WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS!

NOT MANY UP YET, BUT DEFINITELY LOOKS PROMISING.

GREAT DONALD GLUT INTERVIEW

BY ABHAY, AT SAVAGE CRITICS, ON THE REPUBLICATION (FIRST TIME IN ENGLISH) OF GLUT'S VAMPIRE BLAXPLOITATION NOVEL, BROTHER BLOOD (WHICH I ABSOLUTELY NEED TO GET!!!).

ALL CAPS, ALL THE TIME

FOR A WHILE NOW, I'VE CONSIDERED GOING TO ALL-CAPS LIKE THIS, BECAUSE I LIKE THE IDEA OF MY POINTS GETTING ACROSS MORE FORCEFULLY. LET'S GIVE IT A TRY AND SEE HOW IT GOES!