Monday, September 28, 2009

BATMAN: HUSH

It may seem like I've been covering comics a lot here lately, but there are a lot I read that I just don't get around to posting about. This one probably would have fallen into that category if I hadn't checked out Sean Collins's nuclear f-bomb rant about it. It's funny--I wouldn't disagree with any of his criticisms, and most of them occurred to me in my own reading, but rather than come away from Hush with fire-breathing outrage, I actually found it stupidly enjoyable.

Of course Sean and I have different critical perspectives, but I'd guess our wildly divergent reactions are more rooted in the fact that he followed the story over the course of its year-long run in monthly floppies, whereas I polished off the graphic novel in a couple of sittings. I've devoted a previous post to the notion that some superhero events benefit from the monthly pamphlet format and actually suffer from being collected in a graphic novel (and I suspect Blackest Night will fall very firmly into that category), but Hush strikes me as the kind of pop-confection best consumed on a binge, and I can certainly understand how someone who's carried it around somewhere in their mind for a year would react exactly the way Sean did. I can't imagine it repaying that kind of investment, but wow, was it a treat to gorge for a couple of afternoons on the eye-candy Jim Lee served up here. He's always been about the power-poses, but I'm picturing a script with the word "ICONIC!!!" manically scrawled into the margin next to every other panel-breakdown or scene description. It's almost like a collection of disconnected pinups arranged into something like a narrative, with just enough other panels thrown in to serve as minimal connective tissue. Yeah, it's rubbish as far as story is concerned, but surface does matter in visual media, and there's something to be said for a surface as slick and appealing as we find in Hush.

6 comments:

Jonny Metro said...

Thanks for the review, sir Groovy.

I enjoyed Hush for what it was, and I too consumed it in collected form. Hush Returns, on the other hand, was utter trash.

--J/Metro

Malath said...

I enjoyed it... but don't understand why it was so hyped.
Was not That great to me. I love Lees art too but his work I feel is overly hyped.

Rabid Fox said...

I read this over the summer--hardcover collected--and loved it. My first sampling of a Batman graphic novel came in the form of "Batman: Hong Kong," which I did not enjoy at all. "Hush" more than won me over.

Dan said...

HUSH was a quick, entertaining read but I found it pretty quickly forgettable, too. Thanks to Mr. Z I've been knee deep in Bats of late... I have a bunch of issues and graphic novels with post-it note mini-reviews attached to them. Gotta write 'em up for the blog soon.

Gene Phillips said...

Curt,

I enjoyed HUSH pretty much under the same circumstances you did: bought it as a collected TPB and never had to worry about the cumulative letdowns. I thought it was good fun even though I too saw Hush's identity from a mile away. However, unlike Sean I give Loeb points for keeping me guessing about *WHY* New Best Friend had a hate on for You Know Who.

I think Sean said he hadn't read Loebs' previous use of the "Bat-Villains Assemble" theme also seen in THE LONG HALLOWEEN. I'd have to say I liked HUSH better.

Curt Purcell said...

Funny you should mention LONG HALLOWEEN, Gene--your pal Noah Belatsky just reviewed it at Hooded Utilitarian.